mandag den 28. februar 2011

Jihad - Besegra väst inifrån (1)

Den krig - de politisk korrekte og deres bundnaive medløbere - herunder medierne - ikke vil vide noget om - men som truer dig og mig !
videoer 1 - 8

søndag den 27. februar 2011

MGP - en hån mod dansk talent - men typisk Københavneri !

MGP - en hån mod dansk talent - men typisk Københavneri !

af Kai Mikkelsen den 27. februar 2011 kl. 10:22
Så blev den danske befolkning - fra mellemintelligent og opefter - igen hånet, fornedret og krænket på sit almene og i særdeleshed musikalske intellekt !
Felix Buskmand (red dog for helvede dit hår) og Anne Rexi (hvad med at gå i psykologbehandling) holdt seerne i et jerngreb af auditiv talentløshed både verbalt og musikalsk. Bøsselook (George Michael-wanna-bee) og Madonna-like udstilling af kønsdele reddede ikke den bizarre forestilling !
Ingen af de optrædende ville være sluppet forbi Blachmann i indledende runde !
PS: Kan en eller anden ikke påtage sig at træne mikrofonholdere op i at kommunikere med andet end - giv en stor hånd til.....giv en stor hånd til....giv en stor hånd til....
Den store mester Bent Fabricius blev talt ned til, som om han var dybt debil - af Anne Rexi - hvor er hun dog uæstetisk radmager !
MGP - en hån mod dansk talent - men typisk Københavneri !

torsdag den 24. februar 2011

Sam Harris on Liberal Multiculturalism

De liberale fortalere for islam har ikke fattet at de selv vil blive de første ofre, hvis den bevægelse de forsvarer, får magten !

Hvem vil lukke munden på os?

23. February 2011 - klumme af Mogens Camre

Hvem er det, der har ansvaret for de seneste §266b-sager, spørger Mogens Camre. I sidste ende er ansvaret regeringens.

Ingen fjerde statsmagt
Det danske demokrati bygger på princippet om magtens tredeling i den lovgivende, den udøvende og den dømmende magt. En række sager om straffelovens § 266b, ”racismeparagraffen” kunne give anledning til at tro, at vi har en fjerde statsmagt, nemlig anklagemyndigheden, repræsenteret ved rigsadvokaten og under ham statsadvokaterne.
Sådan forholder det sig ikke. Rigsadvokaten og hans underordnede er embedsmænd, som sorterer under justitsministeren. De hører til den udøvende magt og justitsministeren kan beslutte, hvordan deres arbejde skal udføres.
Det giver anledning til at spørge, om det er landets borgerlige regering, der har så travlt med at retsforfølge borgere og politikere, som tillader sig at påpege alvorlige problemer, som beviseligt følger med en fremmed kultur, hvis adfærd afviger fra den europæiske.
Hvem tillader det?

Det burde være umuligt, at en konservativ justitsminister lader anklagemyndigheden rejse en yderst tvivlsom sag mod folketingsmedlem Jesper Langballe, som faktisk er en del af denne regerings parlamentariske grundlag.
Naturligvis gælder straffeloven for medlemmer af folketinget som for andre borgere, hvis den pågældende politiker har begået en forbrydelse.
Det havde Jesper Langballe som bekendt ikke – han havde spydigt sagt nogle bemærkninger om et alvorligt problem i den muslimske kultur og nogle af de sædvanlige stikkere mente at kunne ramme ham ved at anmelde ham til det system, som altså har travlt med at bruge § 266b til at lukke munden på kritikere af den islamiske kulturs problematiske værdibegreber.
Men hvem er det, som tillader, at § 266b bliver udnyttet på den måde? Officielt er det rigsadvokaten, men hvem har bedt ham om det? Handler han af egen drift, burde han instrueres anderledes, men spørgsmålet er, om han ikke lige netop er instrueret, måske ikke af justitsminister Lars Barfod så måske af hans departementschef eller andre embedsmænd.
I sagen mod Lars Hedegaard afsagde Frederiksberg ret en frifindelsesdom, som er lige efter bogen – Hedegaard havde ikke udtalt sig til offentligheden, og måtte derfor frikendes. Alligevel har statsadvokaten anket sagen til Landsretten.
Hvem er så ivrig efter at få Hedegaard straffet? Statsadvokaten? Rigsadvokaten? Justitsministeriets departementschef? Justitsministeren? Hvad er formålet? At tilfredsstille anmelderne? At genere Trykkefrihedsselskabets formand? At få Frederiksberg rets dom stadfæstet for i fremtiden at kunne afvise tilsvarende anmeldelser?
En lodret ordre
Jeg har selv været ude for en noget tilsvarende sag. I september 2001 blev jeg anmeldt af de sædvanlige anmeldere for indholdet af en tale, jeg holdt ved Dansk Folkepartis årsmøde i Vejle. Politimesteren i Vejle afviste at rejse tiltale ud fra den betragtning, at sagen ikke kunne føre til domfældelse.
Men daværende rigsadvokat Henning Fode var ikke tilfreds. Han ville have sagen prøvet igen og sendte den til min politikreds, Gladsaxe. Her kom politiet til samme konklusion, der var ikke grundlag for domfældelse.
Den dag Poul Nyrup udskrev folketingsvalget i 2001 afgjorde rigsadvokaten personligt, at der skulle rejses sag mod mig. Det var fuldt forståeligt – Henning Fode var embedsmand under Nyrup-regeringen og har vel fået en lodret ordre.
Dansk Folkeparti skulle under valgkampen hænges ud som ikke-stuerent, hvis det var muligt.
Europa Parlamentet beskyttede ytringsfriheden

Men først skulle min parlamentariske immunitet hæves af Europa Parlamentet og det var ikke så let. Parlamentets juridiske udvalg sagde, at en tiltale ville være en krænkelse af min ytringsfrihed og afviste at hæve immuniteten.
Det gjorde især socialdemokrater og radikale meget sure. De viste deres modvilje mod en parlamentarisk afgørelse ud fra devisen intet over og intet ved siden af en embedsmand: rigsadvokaten.
I Europa Parlamentet skal en sådan sag til afstemning i plenum. Det skete også – og ulig sædvanen forlangte de danske socialdemokrater skriftlig afstemning. Ved afstemningen i Europa Parlamentet stemte 492 medlemmer for retsudvalgets indstilling om at fastholde min immunitet.
Kun 48 stemte imod. Det var Helle Thorning-Schmidt, Torben Lund, Lone Dybkjær, to tyske socialdemokrater og deres venner fra kommunistgruppen, medens socialdemokraterne og de borgerlige fra alle andre lande stemte for at beskytte ytringsfriheden.
Regeringens ansvar
Man kan slå fast, at det ikke er efter krav fra EU, at Danmark retsforfølger politikere efter § 266b. Ingen andre har pålagt os at bruge § 266b som det sker.
Den ansvarlige er helt åbenbart regeringen – enten fordi den har givet en instruks til rigsadvokaten om at rejse tiltale for alt hvad medlemmer af krænkelseskulturen kan føle sig krænket over, eller fordi den har forsømt at give rigsadvokaten en instruks om at undlade tiltalerejsning, som kun tjener ytringsfrihedens fjenders interesser.
Endelig har Folketinget også lov at tænke selv, og kunne ligesom Europa Parlamentet have nægtet at ophæve Jesper Langballes immunitet.
Det er nok anbefalelsesværdigt at afholde en forespørgselsdebat om brugen af § 266b, så det kan afklares, om der står et folketingsflertal bag ønsket om at lukke munden på danskerne.

http://www.sappho.dk/hvem-vil-lukke-munden-pa-os.htm

AYAAN HIRSI ALI Islam is not an European religion .

Desværre nævner Khader en såkaldt "succésfuld integration" - uden at nævne muslimers massive modstand mod assimilation - i mine øjne er det "succésfuld oprettelse af parallelsamfund" - hvilket Danmark ikke kan holde til !

søndag den 20. februar 2011

Why the English Defence League are coming to blackburn

Anjem Choudary to lead White House protest calling for Muslims to 'rise up' | Mail Online

Extremist cleric to lead White House protest calling for Muslims to 'rise up and establish Islamic state in America'

By Daily Mail Reporter

Call to arms: Muslim extremist Anjem Choudary will call for Sharia law to be established across the U.S.

A hardline Muslim cleric who sparked anger across the U.S. with his anti-American comments in a television interview this month is to hold a protest outside the White House.

British extremist Anjem Choudary - who once said 'the flag of Islam will fly over the White House' - has announced he will lead a demonstration calling on Muslims to establish the Sharia law across America.

The rally, planned for March 3, is to take place just weeks after his on-screen row with Fox News presenter Sean Hannity.

Mr Choudary, 43, called Americans 'the biggest criminals in the world today.'

The former leader of outlawed group Islam4UK told the Daily Star 'we expect thousands to come out and support us.'

Mr Choudary said the March rally was organised by the Islamic Thinkers society, an extremist group based in New York.

Two other British extremists, Abu Izzadeen and Sayful Islam, have also been asked to speak at the demonstration.

Izzadeen is the hate preacher who caused fury last year when he called British soldiers 'murderers' the day he was released from jail after a three-and-a-half year sentence for inciting terrorism.

Mr Choudary told the newspaper: 'The event is a rally, a call for the Sharia, a call for the Muslims to rise up and ­establish the Islamic state in America.'

Furious reaction: Cleric Anjem Choudary made headlines when he was interviewed by Fox News presenter Sean Hannity earlier this month

However, whether the three will be able to enter the U.S., especially Izzadeen, remains to be seen. Even a tourist visa requires applicants to answer questions on whether they have been involved in acts of terrorism or plan to commit crimes in the U.S.

'This is a unique event taking place in Washington, outside the White House which, Inshallah, (God willing) will garner huge support.'

He hit U.S. headlines just two weeks ago after his furious exchange with Mr Hannity on Fox News. The presenter became so enraged with his anti-American comments he ended the interview by calling him a 'sick, miserable, evil S.O.B'.

The East London-based cleric's anti-American stance is well-documented. Last year he led protesters in burning the American flag outside the U.S. embassy in London on September 11.

And in October, he told an ABC chat show that 'one day the flag of Islam will fly over the White House.'

He told the Daily Star: 'They have seen our activities in the UK and Europe and have decided they want to challenge the vacuum in ­freedom and democracy and the ­people in the front line of the struggle against Islam and Muslims - the ­American ­government and the ­establishment.

'They have invited and ­myself and Sayful Islam from Luton to come over to address the crowd and rally support.'

Scene of protest: British extremist cleric Anjem Choudary plans to mount a pro-Islam demonstration outside the White House next month

Scene of protest: British extremist cleric Anjem Choudary plans to mount a pro-Islam demonstration outside the White House next month

'We are going to address ­corruption in the Senate, corrupt foreign ­policy, the mayhem around the ­Muslim world, the drug and ­alcohol culture, ­promiscuity and the pandemic of crime in America.

'It is only right the call is made in the heart of Western ­civilisation in front of the biggest pharaoh that ­exists today, which is Barack Obama.'

He added: 'I think the American people’s hearts and minds are open to receive Islam as an alternative way of life. We expect thousands to come out and support us.'



Freedom Activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff Thanks Her Supporters :: Liberties Alliance

Freedom Activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff Thanks Her Supporters :: Liberties Alliance

Freedom Activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff Thanks Her Supporters

By Aeneas • on February 16, 2011

Elisabeth is a victim of Austrian state repression that puts the interests of Islam before the interests of vulnerable groups in Austrian society. Rather than expose Islam to a national debate that it so desperately needs, if it is to find a productive place in Western society, the Austrian establishment attacks the messenger! Elisabeth has many supporters around the world who will stick with her through thick and thin. The case may have closed, but the struggle is just beginning! Austria has stood up against the interest of human rights and civilisation.
Here are Elisabeth’s thanks to her many supporters (Hat Tip Gates of Vienna):
Dear Friends and Supporters,
Yesterday was a crucial day in our fight against the Islamization of Europe and for the future of our civilization. As most of you know, I was acquitted of the charge of hate speech, but found guilty of denigrating religious teachings of a legally recognized religion. I am sure that you also know that this religion is Islam.
I can tell you that I am shaken to the core; not so much about the guilty verdict — that was a given from the start — but about the judge’s explanation for the verdict. These have been discussed elsewhere, so I will not go into them, but suffice it to say that it was indeed a dark day for young girls in Austria. What shocks me most, however, is that the judge is a woman who should know better. The reasoning used in her judgment is despicable, and a slap in the face for every woman and girl, from every race, religion, or nationality. Marrying and molesting an a child is not to be tolerated, not in the 6th century, not in the 16th century, and definitely not in the 21st century. One would expect a woman, let along a judge, to know this. But the future and the appeals court will hopefully show that this judgment is morally and factually wrong.
Since the curtain has now fallen on the first act of this tragedy, I now want to do a round of thanks. I am indebted to so many people from all over the world, and I will try to do my best to mention most of them here.
First and foremost, I want to honor the Counterjihad Collective, especially Baron Bodissey of Gates of Vienna. Without the tireless and selfless effort of these fine people, all of whom I am privileged to call friends, my case would have remained what it currently is in the MSM: ignored, at best vilified. It is amazing for me to see the results of this fine-tuned effort on a daily basis.
Imagine the following: My lawyer sends me a document regarding my case; I in turn send it to the German-English translator JLH, who in no time returns the translation to me. Baron Bodissey edits and posts on Gates of Vienna. Once the document is published, other translators grab the post and disseminate it in their blogs; other English language bloggers publish on their blogs.
If I am interviewed on camera, Vlad Tepes and KitmanTV are on hand to youtube these reports, and Baron Bodissey is on hand to post. Transcribers are called to action, with translators, to subtitle if needed.
The result is without a doubt the most comprehensive reporting about Counterjihad activities currently available. The MSM are not doing their jobs, we are. And we should be proud of this achievement. A big Thank You to all involved in this.
Second, I want to thank my family and friends for their support in these hard times. On many an evening was I cranky after having spent more than ten hours poring over the Quran, the Hadith, and The Reliance of the Traveller. You all know just how horrible the contents of these books are, and I can now tell you that studying Islamic texts can affect your psyche. I want to honor my daughter, who was more than patient when Mommy had an important Skype call to discuss some point raised by my lawyer.
Which brings me to my brilliant legal team. Dr. Rami and Mr. Strobl have been thrown into the cold water of Islamic doctrine. In little more than a year, they both became more knowledgeable in Islamic teachings than the majority of the population. They are now aware of the teachings of the Koran, they now know all about the sharia and its implications on our free society. And they did a marvelous job defending me and Western civilization. Thank you.
Heartfelt thanks and appreciation are also more than due to my supporters, be they politicians, bloggers, donors, and those who comment in those blogs and newspaper forums, whether you are from Europe, the United States, Canada or Australia.
Thank you, Geert Wilders, Rene Stadtkewitz, Kent Ekeroth, and Heinz-Christian Strache for repeatedly bringing up my case. Those political parties who so far have not understood the ramifications of this case will be judged by history.
Thank you also to the Wiener Akademikerbund, ACT! for America, Citizens’ Movement Pax Europa, The English Defense League, Riposte Laïque, and all other organizations that support me and continue to support me so generously. Without you I could not have gone through with this.
Thank you to the numerous well-wishers and supporters who have written to me in the past hours and days, or have written thoughtful comments about yesterday’s outcome.
I want to present two representative examples here:
One man from Koblenz:
As an ex-Muslim from Iran I want to wish you all the best and would like to support you if possible.
I also want to wish lots of strength and endurance in your fight against mafia called politics and law, which is controlled by the political left.
It is people like you who were in the resistance during the Nazi era, instead of swimming like dead fish in a stream of conformism and shutting up.
I hope that your appeal will be transferred to a judge who is still sane and who doesn’t retroactively legalize child abuse like the previous actor-judge.
Another comment:
What was the EU-framework decision combating anti-discrimination all about?
“No one may be discriminated against because of their (amongst others) beliefs.
Ah, yes, right. Do not discriminate.
But indicting and charging one is allowed.
This is disgusting.
From the bottom of my heart I want the judge to experience what it means to live under Sharia law, especially if she has children. When the first “cultural enricher” rapes her daughter for the first time I suggest she read a few Koran suras to her daughter to comfort her.
Finally, please continue your support in whatever way you can. This is about all of you as much as it is about me. This is about our future.
Never give up.
Never give in.
Never surrender.
— Elisabeth

lørdag den 19. februar 2011

SVERIGE - HELVEDES FORGÅRD !

Det folkhemska infernot

Publicerat 19 februari 2011 
I Helvetets förgård slaktar Lars Holger Holm heliga svenska kor på löpande band. Det moderna Sverige beskrivs som en tragikomisk bananrepublik som körts i botten av ett korrumperat medieetablissemang, nepotistiska tjänstemän, imbecilla politiker och statsfeminism. Daniel Söderberg har läst nyutgåvan av Holms provokativa klassiker.

foto Kai Mikkelsen

Köp boken

Adlibris – 198 kr
Lars Holger Holm har haft den dåliga smaken och den ohyggliga fräckheten att utsätta det moderna svenska samhällsbygget för systematisk och grundlig kritik. Därför är det kanske inte så konstigt att hans Helvetets förgård möttes av en total, iskall tystnad av det svenska kulturetablissemanget när boken släpptes för första gången år 2001. En av de få bokhandlare som inledningsvis sålde pocketutgåvan valde efter bara några veckor att dra in den igen – eftersom ett par unga tjejer som jobbade i kassan hade ”förfärats” över kapitelrubriken ”Nödvändigheten av prostitution och droger”.
Denna anekdot, obehagligt gnagande som den är, är bara en av många små klaustrofobiska skildringar från sin folkhemska fångenskap som Holm kryddar sin framställning med. Den är också oerhört belysande för det svenska kulturella klimat som här beskrivs – en tillvaro där medelmåttan, eller snarare undermåttan, alltmer kommit att upphöjas till ideal. Där trendmedvetna, förnumstiga ”unga tjejer” som fått vittring på politiskt inkorrekta tankegångar sätts till doms över eftertänksamma, ansvarstagande äldre herrar. Den stora pöbel av kvinnliga journalister som gick till storms mot Ulf Nilson (vars bok Sverige – sluten anstalt Holm för övrigt refererar friskt till) för ett par månader sedan är bara det senaste i en lång rad exempel.
Men hur kunde det egentligen bli som det blev? Hur förvandlades vårt land till ett Kärringvälde? Den första delen av Helvetets förgård är något så intressant som en politiskt inkorrekt resumé över hela den svenska historien, från ”svionerna”, via uppkomsten av ämbetsadeln, till det ödesdigra socialdemokratiska maktövertagandet. Socialdemokraternas (läs: samtliga partier i riksdagen idag) historiska övergrepp prickas av, ett efter ett.
Här finns inte minst en djupt känd förtvivlan över det rent estetiska förfall som ledsagat nutidshistoriens politiska utveckling. Den systematiska förfulningen av stadsbilden som kulminerade (?) i och med Miljonprogrammet representerar naturligtvis, vid sidan av all annan djävulskap staten har utsatt oss för, en särskilt vass dolk i ryggen på en konstnärligt sinnad person (Holm är professionell violinist). Alldeles oavsett all kulturell, språklig, politisk dissonans kanske man skulle kunna fördra ett liv även i Kärringarnas Sverige, kanske åtminstone lyckas skapa en illusion av någon form av harmoni… om bara allting inte vore så otroligt fult.
Att läsa Lars Holger Holm är sannerligen en resa, inte bara mellan vitt skilda ämnen utan också mellan högt och lågt. Ena stunden är han en aforistiker i världsklass, som behandlar de eviga frågorna med filosofisk skärpa och stilistisk glans. I nästa stund är han en elak, bitter gubbe, en oförsonlig ”vän av ordning” som gnäller om lapplisor, språkförbistring och respektlösa tonåringar. För att inte tala om Systembolaget, som mannen uppenbarligen avskyr med en nästan irrationell glöd. Rolig är han i alla fall, nästan hela tiden.
Helvetets förgård är, hursomhelst, en omistlig bok för varje oppositionell som vill skapa sig en bredare bild av mekanismerna bakom den synnerligen prekära situation, på god väg mot bristningsgränsen, som vi befinner oss i idag. Här, och i Holms övriga böcker, finns en stor källa till inspirerande kritiska tankar rörande det svenska samhällsklimatet, argument som aldrig kommer att luftas i DN – eller i någon av de andra etablerade, ”samförstående” mediekanalerna heller, för den delen. I rätt händer skulle Holms böcker kunna bli en sprängdeg; med en rejäl spridning skulle de kunna få mängder av svenskar att börja tänka i friskare, mer kritiska banor.
Lars Holger Holm är före sin tid – det är han själv medveten om. När tidsandan svänger till hans (och vår) favör kommer han att få den upprättelse som han förtjänar. Låt oss bara hoppas att den dagen inte låter sig vänta alltför länge.
DANIEL SÖDERBERG

S anklagas för valfusk i Rosengård - Fria Tider

S anklagas för valfusk i Rosengård - Fria Tider

S anklagas för valfusk i Rosengård

Publicerat 17 februari 2011 kl 14:53
Före valdagen hade 1096 personer plötsligt förtidsröstat i Rosengårds Citygrossbutik i stället för i de vanliga vallokalerna, och bara under valhelgen tredubblas antalet förtidsröster jämfört med föregående val. Nu anklagas socialdemokraterna för att ligga bakom den mystiska ökningen.

– Det påstås att partierna var väldigt aktiva därute. Eller, rättare sagt, ett parti. Socialdemokraterna. De fick verkligen folk till valurnorna, säger Johan Hansson, som var valnämndens sekreterare till Skånskan.

Enligt förbipasserande som Skånskan talat med stod socialdemokratiska valarbetare utanför stormarknaden med preparerade valkuvert, igenklistrade och med partiets valsedlar inuti. Kuverten lämnades till förbipasserande invandrare som inte ens kunde svenska. Bakom fusket stod invandrarpolitikern Jamal El-Haj (S).

– Han sa att det bara var att lägga de färdiga kuverten i lådorna. Folk fick inte en chans att välja själv.

En annan invandrarpolitiker, fullmäktigeledamoten Mohammad Mohammad (M), bevittnade också fusket men ingrep inte. Enligt honom hade socialdemokraterna ordnat stora kuvert som innehöll de mindre kuverten med socialdemokratiska valsedlar för riksdag, region och kommun. Dessa gavs sedan till ”gamla tanter från Mellanöstern” och folk som nyss fått uppehållstillstånd – människor som, enligt Mohammad Mohammad, inte vet hur man röstar och som, enligt kritiker, kanske inte heller borde ha rösträtt i Sverige.

– Överhuvudtaget anser jag att det brast i demokratin i Malmö under valrörelsen, speciellt i områden som Rosengård, säger han till Skånskan.

Muslimsk slavehandel har nu varet i 1400 år | Kristeligt Dagblad

Muslimsk slavehandel har nu varet i 1400 år | Kristeligt Dagblad

Muslimsk slavehandel har nu varet i 1400 år

Den senegalesiske antropolog Tidiane N'Diaye vækker opsigt med sine skildringer af 1400 års muslimsk slavehandel i Afrika.

- Fra Tidiane N'Diayes hjemmeside


Emneord for denne artikel

islam | slaveri | Afrika | Slavehandel | Tidiane NDiaye
flexblock
3 debatindlæg Hold mig opdateret

Den senegalesiske antropolog Tidiane N'Diaye har beskrevet arabiske muslimers 1400-årige udnyttelse, drab og deportationer af millioner af afrikanere. Slaver er ved kastrering blevet afskåret fra at få efterkommere. N'Diaye betegner dette underbelyste emne som et tilsløret folkemord

Man associerer almindeligvis slavehandelen med europæernes transport af afrikanere tværs over Atlanten i tætpakkede skibe til plantagearbejde i Amerika. Fem procent af denne transport gik til USA, og deres efterkommere er som befolkningsgruppe et vidnesbyrd om deportationen. De største aktører inden for slaveri-institutionen var imidlertid ikke europæerne, men de arabiske muslimer, og deres ofre var ud over afrikanere også cirka 1.250.000 europæere.
Muslimernes 300-årige slavehandel med europæere beskrives i Robert C. Davis' bog "Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters" og blev i efteråret behandlet i DR's dokumentarserie "Hvide slaver". På det afrikanske kontinent har de arabiske muslimer organiseret og udført en omfattende slavehandel, der foreløbig har strakt sig over 1400 år. Den er således langt mere omfattende og grusom og strækker sig over meget længere tid end europæernes slavehandel.

Hvor afrikanerne i stor udstrækning kunne bevare deres familiestrukturer i USA og føre slægten videre, som det ses af nutidens store amerikanske befolkningsgruppe af afrikansk afstamning, var der kun få efterkommere i den muslimske verden. Dette skyldes navnlig en udbredt kastrering af de mandlige slaver og drab på de kvindelige slavers spædbørn.

Hvor slaverne i Amerika blev betragtet som en investering, som slaveejeren havde en interesse i at behandle rimeligt for at drage nytte af deres arbejdskraft, blev slaverne i den muslimske verden slidt op, hvorefter man hentede nye forsyninger i Afrika. Tidiane N'Diaye har beskrevet disse forhold i sin bog "Le génocide voilé" (Det tilslørede folkemord) fra 2008.

Annonce
Samfundstrukturen i de kulturelt forskelligartede afrikanske stammer var oprindeligt præget af en hierarkisk opbygning, der kunne minde om det indiske kastesystem. De laveste sociale klasser arbejdede i en form for livegenskab. De blev respekteret og betragtedes ofte som en del af værtsfamilien.

Denne samfundsopbygning ændredes i takt med de arabiske muslimers fremmarch på det afrikanske kontinent. Muslimerne foretog voldelige røveriske overfald på landsbyer, som de satte ild til. De overlevende blev taget til fange og ført ud til handelsstationer på Afrikas nordkyst og østkyst. Overfaldene tog gradvist til i omfang og blev systematiserede.
Muslimerne udbyggede det oprindelige livegenskabssystem, men de ændrede fuldstændig dets karakter. De fik hjælp af lokale, der som menneskejægere tjente på samarbejdet, og ud over griskhed blev nogle hjælpere motiveret af en fattigdom, der var forårsaget af afbrændingerne.

Der var dog også modige og karismatiske afrikanske modstandsfolk. Særlig kendt er afrikanernes oprør i det nuværende Irak i år 869. De nåede at oprette deres egen stat i området, inden oprøret blev slået ned. De påførte dog de muslimske magthavere store tab.

Det organiserede slaveri i Afrika tog sin begyndelse i Darfur i år 652, da den sudanske leder stiftede fred med invaderende muslimer under ydmygende fredsbetingelser. Der blev underskrevet en fredsaftale, der forpligtede ham til en årlig leverance af flere hundrede slaver til de muslimske magthavere.

Hermed blev grunden lagt for de arabiske muslimers institutionaliserede slaveri i Afrika, og slaveriet foregår stadigvæk i Darfur den dag i dag, uden at det internationale samfund sætter effektivt ind over for det (takket være Sydsudans nylige afstemning om en formel løsrivelse fra det muslimsk dominerede nord, der blev vedtaget med overvældende flertal, har kristne og animistiske sudanere nu udsigt til et tiltrængt helle i den del af landet). Det har således stået på i omkring 1400 år.

Islam bredte sig ved sin begyndelse med stor hast på den arabiske halvø – med dødstrusler, hvis man ikke underkastede sig, og løfter om krigsbytte, hvis man omvendte sig. Med muslimernes ekspansion på det afrikanske kontinent blev meddelagtighed i den indbringende slavehandel endnu en motivationsfaktor for at deltage i den islamiske jihad, ligesom afrikaneren i teorien kunne undgå at blive slave, hvis han omvendte sig til islam.

Det hed sig, at ingen muslim kunne trælbindes, men i praksis blev også sorte muslimer taget til fange og gjort til slaver. Dette skyldtes, at de arabiske muslimer i takt med slaveriets udbredelse udviklede en dyb foragt for de sorte afrikanere. Det arabiske ord abd, der betyder slave, brugtes også nedsættende om den sorte afrikaner.

Tidiane N'Diaye bringer i bogen gribende beretninger om den lange og ubarmhjertige transport af fanger fra kontinentets indre ud til Afrikas østkyst og nordpå igennem Saharas vidtstrakte ørken op til Afrikas nordkyst. Man kunne let følge slaveruterne, idet der lå menneskeknogler spredt i vejkanten.

Ved Tanganyikasøen observerede Stanley, hvordan mange lig lå og flød langs søens bredder. Da han spurgte en araber om grunden hertil, sagde denne nøgternt konstaterende, at ådselsæderne normalt spiste dem, men at der dette år havde været flere lig, end de kunne overkomme.

Gribende er også Antoine de Saint-Exupérys beretning om den stedlige slave, der når han engang blev for gammel til at være til nytte, ville blive smidt på porten, hvorefter han afkræftet og udsultet ville drage ud i ørkenen for at lægge sig til at dø. Muslimske mauriske børn ville så nysgerrigt iagttage ham i hans dødskamp, mens de legede ved siden af.

Tidiane N'Diaye nævner det paradoksale i, at mange amerikanere af afrikansk afstamning bekender sig til islam, når netop denne ideologi har påført deres forfædre så store lidelser. De afrikanske efterkommere ønsker tilsyneladende at fortrænge ydmygelsen, og det giver sig udslag i en reaktion, som forfatteren betegner som det afrikanske Stockholm-syndrom.

Herudover har flere grupperinger et ønske om at fastholde Vesten i skyldfølelse over europæernes andel i slavehandelen. Ved at påtage sig en offerrolle i denne forbindelse kan afrikanere og muslimer påberåbe sig moralsk overlegenhed over for vesterlændinge. Disse grupper får følgeskab af vestlige "oikofober", der foragter deres egen kultur, heriblandt også forskere.

De arabiske muslimers omfattende og grusomme udbytning af afrikanerne igennem 1400 år tilsløres, mens europæernes ansvar for den transatlantiske slavehandel er blevet udførligt beskrevet og beklaget. Der er aldrig sket et lignende selvopgør i den muslimske verden, idet den ikke er præget af skyldfølelse over overgrebene på de afrikanske folk.

Tidiane N'Diaye betegner de arabiske muslimers udbytning af afrikanerne som et folkemord. Han argumenterer for, at dette ikke er for stærkt et udtryk, men at det tværtimod er en dækkende beskrivelse af overgrebet. Man ønskede i den muslimske verden at have fuld kontrol over de tilfangetagne slaver. De blev derfor forhindret i at få efterkommere, både ved omfattende kastreringer og ved børnedrab.

Kastreringen foregik på systematisk vis på lokaliteter langs slaveruten frem mod kystens handelsstationer. Operationen fandt sted under primitive forhold og med stor dødelighed til følge. De overlevende indbragte en god pris og var efterspurgte som vagter ved de muslimske haremmer.

Det er vanskeligt at estimere det samlede antal ofre. Ud over de mange deporterede afrikanere, N'Diaye estimerer antallet til 17 millioner, døde ganske mange afrikanere under tilfangetagelserne og fangetransporterne.

Kirsten Valeur er oversætter

torsdag den 17. februar 2011

RELIGIONSFRIHEDEN ER EN KATASTROFE

RELIGIONSFRIHEDEN ER EN KATASTROFE

af Kai Mikkelsen den 17. februar 2011 kl. 13:55
RELIGIONSFRIHEDEN ER EN KATASTROFE

Religionsfixering er under afvikling - heldigvis - på grund af viden, rationalitet og intelligens - men - bruges nu som overskrifter over fraktioner, der ønsker at positionere sig i opposition til "de andre" - den katastrofale Religionsfrihed, vi har her i landet - er katastrofal - fordi den ikke fra et Nationalt Samfundbaseret synspunkt indeholder ufravigelige krav - og klare retningslinier for hvad vi som samfund kan og vil acceptere af religiøse trosretninger inden de kan godkendes her i landet. Blandt andet en autoritativ understregning af, at ingen relifiøse dogmer, handlinger og traditioner står over danske love og forordninger.
 
En moské - feks. - hører overhovedet ikke hjemme i et dansk landskab - PERIOD - Vore forgængere vikingerne valgte islam fra da de for 1000 år siden stødte på den i Konstantinopel og andre steder - et fravalg de gjorde rigtigt i - og som vi har svigte......t katastrofalt ved ikke at leve op til ! At vi i vores naive "humanisme" har tilladt muslimer at komme og få føde og tag over hovedet - medfører ikke automatisk at deres religiøse/politiske dogmer og agendaer - automatisk skal implementeres i det danske samfund.
Men den lille daglige dosis af pladderhumanisme har medført at vi rykker os lisså stille - "nå - ja - det kan da ikke gøre noget - det kand a ikke skade - når nu de er her så....osv..osv. Og nu er vi nået dertil at vi siger...jamen selvfølgelig skal de da have et sted hvor de kan dyrke deres tro og bla bla...Nej GU ska de ej - sålænge den form for tro de dyrker kolliderer med danske love normer og traditioner - BASTA !
Når et af deres hovedbudskaber forbyder ASSIMILERING med den oprindeligebefolkning - altså den befolkning der skabt og opbygget landet og det solidariske samfund, og hvis resultater de i den grad nyder godt af, men altså ikke vil assimeleres med - så er det UD !

Sudden Jihad: Muslim Cab Driver Plows Down Crowded Sidewalk in San Diego - Atlas Shrugs

Sudden Jihad: Muslim Cab Driver Plows Down Crowded Sidewalk in San Diego - Atlas Shrugs

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Sudden Jihad: Muslim Cab Driver Plows Down Crowded Sidewalk in San Diego

Last Saturday, a Muslim taxi driver slowly plowed into a crowd of people on a busy sidewalk in San Diego. It sounded almost immediately like lone jihadi syndrome. And they would not release his name, which always makes me suspicious. They only do that when it's Islamic.

Lone jihadi or sudden jihad. We see this repeatedly.

One girl was pinned against a wall and had her leg severed. 35 people were injured and most were transported to hospitals. They had injuries such as broken bones, cuts and bruises, So incensed was the crowd that members of the crowd pulled him out of the cab and assaulted him. UPDATE: After the attack he jumped out of the taxi and started stabbing people with a pair of scissors.

I did not post on it because the authorities refused to publish his name. It took a few days, but now we know that he was a 52-year-old Egyptian-born cab driver, Hasan Daly.

The original FOX article (below) said "the driver, who is between 40 and 50 years old, either fell asleep or passed out. Alcohol was not involved." But he didn't fall alseep. Police confirmed Daly stopped at the stop sign on the corner before driving about 15 miles per hour into the crowd.

Wait, get this:

When emergency crews first arrived, they were told to clear the area because of fears that the taxi might have had explosives inside it. A witness reported seeing a bag with wires coming out of it on the taxi's seats. The bag turned out to be a massager, according to the San Diego Union-Tribune.

People thought it was a a terror attack. And this would-be slaughterer was not arrested and no charges have been filed.

Sammy Nour, who hired Daly years ago as a company limousine driver, said Daly is a hard worker but a very private person."I was shocked," said Nour. Indeed.

Taxi Plows Into Crowd in San Diego FOX News

SAN DIEGO -- A taxi cab driver plowed slowly into a crowd on a sidewalk in San Diego's busy Gaslamp District early Saturday, injuring more than two dozen people, police said.

The San Diego Union-Tribune reported that the crash occurred about 2 a.m. in the middle of the popular restaurant and nightclub zone, close to the city's convention center.

One young woman was pinned against a wall by the cab and had her leg severed.

Officer Michael Stirk said security guards from a nearby nightclub detained the driver. He was then transported to a hospital with a broken nose after being beaten by angry members in the crowd and having his taxi’s windows smashed.

Stirk said the driver, who is between 40 and 50 years old, either fell asleep or passed out. Alcohol was not involved, he said.

Police Lt. Todd Jarvis told the Union-Tribune that officials are investigating why the driver drove onto the sidewalk. The cab was traveling slowly, around 15 mph, and the crash did not appear to be intentional, authorities said.

One off-duty military paramedic who had been at a nearby nightclub told the Union-Tribune the scene was initially chaos, with people screaming and yelling. He said he went to the aid of three of the injured who were lying in the street and assisted them until paramedics soon arrived.

Fire Capt. Rocky Delgadillo was heading to a local air show but ended up at the scene last night just moments after emergency crews were dispatched.

"It was what we call organized chaos," Delgadillo said. "In 31 years, this is the most patients I've seen at one scene in a mass casualty incident."

The newspaper reported that 25 people were injured. Early Saturday morning, all but two were taken to area hospitals. Their conditions were not available due to privacy laws.

Authorities had no immediate plans to arrest the driver, whose name was not immediately available.

Roommate of Stingaree Cab Driver says He Feared for His Life

SAN DIEGO - Dan Rose says he has been living with Sam Hassan Daly for the last two months. Rose says, "he's a pretty solitary man kind of a recluse I guess you would call it."

Rose says things have gotten progressively worse since he moved in. "It's been a very uncomfortable situation living here the last couple months."

A photo shows Daly's cab parked in the garage before Saturday morning's crash. A crash and confrontation that injured 35 people in the Gaslamp district in front of Stingaree nightclub.

Rose said he feared the 52-year-old Egyptian born cab driver. "Just very irrational behavior, um I don't know if it was necessarily a terroristic type thing or maybe he's just imbalanced."

Rose said Daly called him names and confronted him for bringing a date home. The confrontation scared him so much, he began to carry a knife with him in the house.

Rose says, "the reaction he had towards me kind of made me a little scared so I carry one with me even in my home when I'd go to the bathroom."

Rose says Daly gave him his move out notice last Friday. That the home is in foreclosure and Daly was leaving the country and heading back to Egypt.

UPDATE: More proof of malicious intent: A quote from this article: (hat tip Mike)

Stingaree owner James Brennan said the cabbie had a pair of scissors in his hand that he swung at one of the club managers, although he didn’t know what the driver intended to do with them.

He intended to stab them. After the attack, he jumped out of the taxi and started stabbing people with a pair of scissors.

tirsdag den 15. februar 2011

Blodskam OK - det bli'r jo i familien !

Marriage between cousins faces ban

February 9, 2011  
Marriage between cousins was once fairly common, not least in royal circles, with Norway’s own king the product of parents who were first cousins. Now the Labour Party’s committee on integration, headed by Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, wants to ban such unions, setting off debate because of the stigmas it could create.
The parents of Norway's King Harald V, the late King Olav and Crown Princess Märtha, were cousins, but now a Labour Party panel recommends banning such unions, not least to reduce the incidence of forced marriage within the immigrant community. PHOTO: Det Kongelige Hoff
The head of the Norwegian Immigrants’ Forum (Norsk Innvandrerforum) calls the proposal  a “travesty.” Experts are also skeptical, claiming there’s not enough medical proof that all such marriages can cause the genetic health problems that Labour fears.
“A ban is no solution,” Athar Ali, head of the Norwegian Immigrants’ Forum, told newspaper Dagsavisen. In contrast to Støre’s concerns about marriages between cousins, Ali speaks warmly about them and points to several advantages.
‘Slap in the face’
“It’s safe because one knows one’s cousins better than other outsiders. It’s common practice in Muslim countries. It’s important in building alliances for the family. A daughter-in-law, who is also a niece, is better-suited to look after the older family members than someone who doesn’t know the family well,” Ali claimed.
Ali, a former member of Norway’s parliament for the far-left Red Party (Rødt), is not worried by the increased likelihood of illness among the children of parents who are cousins. He emphasizes that more people now take genetic tests before marriage to check if it is safe for them to have children.
“As long as the marriage is voluntary, one can’t forbid it. Yes, there are instances of duress, but it’s increasingly usual for the partners themselves to be involved. A ban is a slap in the face to those who want to marry for love,” Ali told Dagsavisen.
Labour recognizes risks involved
Dr Ingvild Heier, a pediatrician at Oslo University Hospital at Ullevål, strongly criticized marriage between cousins in a recent letter to newspaper VG. She wrote that she meets many mothers who are unaware of the risk they are exposing their children to.
The Labour Party has taken up her arguments. The party’s committee recommends banning marriages between cousins because of the risk involved to their children and also to reduce the number of arranged, sometimes forced marriages, confirms Støre.
“It would be wrong not to do anything about this matter knowing the health effects and without trying to reduce the number of children harmed,” Støre told Dagsavisen.
Most common in Pakistani families
Marriages between cousins are now most common in the Pakistani immigrant community in Norway. The Norwegian Institute of Public Health published a paper in 2007 that concluded that around half of Pakistani-Norwegian spouses in Norway are married to their first or second cousin. Although the report states that the incidence of marriage to close relations is declining, figures from 2009 published by Statistics Norway (SSB) indicate that 35 per cent of married or engaged Pakistanis between 20 – 25 years old are married or engaged to a close relation. Many of the marriages are between a person who still lives in Pakistan and a relation with Norwegian citizenship, which can allow the person to emigrate from Pakistan to Norway.
Several experts disagree with Støre. Anthropologist Torunn Arntsen Sajjad has carried out a number of studies among Pakistanis that have children with disabilities. She does not refute the problems that such marriages can entail, but thinks a ban will make things worse. “This is not the way to avoid forced marriages or medical problems,” Arntsen Sajjad told Dagsavisen.
Fears of stigmas
Camilla Stoltenberg, physician and deputy director at the Institute of Public Health, has warned the immigrant community several times about the dangers of having children with a close relation. Yet she too does not believe that a ban would be best.
“I’m skeptical,” Stoltenberg, the sister of Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, told Dagsavisen. “A ban might stigmatize those who are already married to their cousin. It could mean that patients fail to tell doctors that they are closely related, which is not good when judging medical risks.”
Ali fears that a ban could lead to a backlash resulting in more cousins marrying each other. He thinks the way forward lies through tolerance and information. Torunn Arnstad Sajjad agrees. She thinks that change must come from within the community. She warns against Norway spearheading a move to criminalize a relationship which is considered entirely appropriate in many cultures.
Views and News from Norway/Sven Goll

http://www.newsinenglish.no/2011/02/09/marriage-between-cousins-faces-ban/

billede indsat af KM !

Dutch court has granted Geert Wilders an opportunity to challenge the validity of an inciting hatred case

Justice | 14.02.2011

Dutch anti-Islam MP to press for dismissal of racial hate trial

 

A Dutch court has granted right-wing anti-Islam populist Geert Wilders an opportunity to challenge the validity of an inciting hatred case currently against him in the Hague.

 

A Dutch court has given anti-Islam lawmaker Geert Wilders the chance to challenge the competence of prosecutors seeking to have him jailed over charges of inciting hatred against Muslims.
Judge Marcel van Oosten said Monday that if Wilders could show that the prosecution was unsound, then the case against the far-right politician would be dropped.
"The court finds in this unusual case that space should be given to the defense to repeat its earlier defense arguments to the new judges," the judge said.
"If these objections are successful, and the prosecution is declared incompetent, then the case will be closed and terminated."
Wilders, 47, faces five counts of offending and inciting hatred against Muslims and groups of non-Western origin, particularly Moroccans.
Trial was adjourned
He had originally gone on trial in October last year, but proceedings were adjourned after three weeks, when the judges trying him were ordered to step down over accusations of bias against Wilders.
The nationalist politician has claimed he is being persecuted for his political views. He has likened Islam to fascism and made comparisons between the Muslim holy book, the Koran, and Hitler's "Mein Kampf".
The specific charges against the parliamentarian stem from comments made in his campaign "Stop the Islamization of the Netherlands." Wilders could face a 7,600-euro ($10,300) fine or up to a year in jail if found guilty.
Wilders shot to prominence in 2008 after making the short film, "Fitna", mixing Koranic verses with footage of extremist attacks.
His populist group, the Freedom Party, is the third largest in parliament in the Hague, and is a crucial unofficial ally for the minority coalition government of Christian Democrats and Liberals.
Author: Darren Mara (AFP, Reuters)
Editor: Nicole Goebel

"Kultur"-forbrydelser ?

Indvandrerpiger forsvinder sporløst

18. okt. 2008 09.08 Fyn og øerneAntallet af indvandrerpiger, der forsvinder sporløst er større end myndighederne hidtil har troet.
Derfor vil statsadvokaturen for internationale straffesager undersøge, hvor mange af dem, der har været ofre for en forbrydelse.
Det viser sig nemlig at et stort antal indvandrerpioger forsvinder uden det bliver anmeldt til politiet. Oplysninger i cpr-registret viser at piger fra bla Pakistan og Tyrkiet er forsvundet.
Landsorganisationen for kvindekrisecentre mener pigerne bliver sendt på genopdragelse i forældrenes hjemland eller udsættes for en forbrydelse. Og at det gælder mange flere piger end man kender til.
Det får nu politiet til at efterforske sagerne med de forsvundne piger i cpr-registret.

mandag den 14. februar 2011

There is something rodden - in the state of - England !

Shame of Britain's Muslim schools: Secret filming shows pupils being beaten and 'taught Hindus drink cow p***'

By Tazeen Ahmad
Last updated at 12:16 PM on 13th February 2011


  • Undercover footage shows pupils being taught religious apartheid
  • Muslims who adopt Western ways will be 'tortured in afterlife'
  • Unprovoked beatings captured on camera in Yorkshire madrassa
  • Boy threatened with bench by senior student left in charge of class
It is an assembly hall of the sort found in any ordinary school. Boys aged 11 and upwards sit cross-legged on the floor in straight rows. They face the front of the room and listen carefully. But this is no ordinary assembly. Holding the children’s attention is a man in Islamic dress wearing a skullcap and stroking his long dark beard as he talks.
‘You’re not like the non-Muslims out there,’ the teacher says, gesturing towards the window. ‘All that evil you see in the streets, people not wearing the hijab properly, people smoking . . . you should hate it, you should hate walking down that street.’
He refers to the ‘non-Muslims’ as the ‘Kuffar’, an often derogatory term that means disbeliever or infidel.
Grabbed: Secretly filmed footage from the Markazi Jamia mosque shows a teacher pulling a pupil towards him and striking him on the back
Grabbed: Secretly filmed footage from the Markazi Jamia mosque shows a teacher pulling a pupil towards him and striking him on the back
Slapped: A child receives a sharp blow on the back of the head from the same teacher. The impact of the blow can be heard on the film
Slapped: A child receives a sharp blow on the back of the head from the same teacher. The impact of the blow can be heard on the film
Welcome to one of Britain’s most influential Islamic faith schools, one of at least 2,000 such schools in Britain, some full-time, others part-time. They represent a growing, parallel education system.
The school is the Darul Uloom Islamic High School in Birmingham, an oversubscribed independent secondary school. Darul Ulooms are world-renowned Islamic institutions and their aim is to produce the next generation of Muslim leaders. In fact, these schools have been described as the ‘Etons of Islam’.

 
This school is required by its inspectors to teach tolerance and respect for other faiths. But the Channel 4 current affairs programme Dispatches filmed secretly inside it – and instead discovered that Muslim children are being taught religious apartheid and social segregation.
We recorded a number of speakers giving deeply disturbing talks about Jews, Christians and atheists.
We found children as young as 11 learning that Hindus have ‘no intellect’ and that they ‘drink cow p***’.
And we came across pupils being told that the ‘disbelievers’ are ‘the worst creatures’ and that Muslims who adopt supposedly non-Muslim ways, such as shaving, dancing, listening to music and – in the case of women – removing their headscarves, would be tortured with a forked iron rod in the afterlife.
In 2009 this school was praised by Government-approved inspection teams for its interfaith teachings. The report said that ‘pupils learn about the beliefs and practices of other faiths and are taught to show respect to other world religions’.
It seems that the inspectors were unaware of the teaching methods revealed by our undercover reporter, Osman. He was taken on as a volunteer at the Darul Uloom school in Birmingham in April 2009 and was allowed to sit in on some lessons – but not their Islamic classes.
Warning: Reporter Tazeen Ahmad says Muslim schools need closer scrutiny
Warning: Reporter Tazeen Ahmad says Muslim schools need closer scrutiny
So, in July last year, he went into one of the rooms where we’d heard they taught Islamic studies and left a secret camera to record the lessons.
Filming intermittently over a period of four months, the camera recorded children being taught a hardline, intolerant and highly anti-social version of Islam.
During the same period our reporter also attended the Markazi Jamia mosque in Keighley, West Yorkshire, after hearing of serious allegations that children were being hit at its madrassa.
Madrassas in the UK are part-time after-school or weekend classes, often held in mosques, where children are taught to read the Koran. In Keighley it is not what they are being taught that is the problem, but how.
Again, Osman went into the mosque and left the camera in the room where classes took place.
The film shows children as young as six sitting on the floor of a large room in the mosque, one of the biggest in the country. The boys are hunched over wooden benches, rocking backwards and forwards as they rote-learn the Koran in Arabic. A man with a long white beard dressed in a traditional shalwar kameez – tunic and trousers – sits at the head of the class.
Periodically he gets up and walks behind the boys. As he passes, the children appear to cower and watch him nervously. It soon becomes clear why.
He unexpectedly raises his hand and slaps a young boy hard on the head. Moments later he strikes another. And then he kicks a third child.

In just two days of filming in December 2010, the camera recorded the teacher hitting children as young as six or seven at least ten times, in less than three hours of lessons.
From what we could see, every ¬single blow was pretty much unprovoked. We soon realised that the beatings were routine. The behaviour of the boys, the way they flinched and backed away when he approached, indicated that they were long-accustomed to being hit and kicked as they studied.
In another incident an older boy, left in charge of a class while a teacher is out at prayer, picks up a bench and threatens to hit a younger boy with it.
During the making of this Dispatches film I have often counted my blessings. I received my Islamic education at home. My mum would read the Koran with me and most of my knowledge of Islam came from within the family. Others have not been so lucky.
Osman was subjected to beatings at four separate madrassas in the East Midlands as a child. He says that for the nine years he spent going to after-school Koran classes, he was hit regularly, at least a couple of timesa week.
‘It destroyed my confidence,’ he says, ‘and the worst bit was never knowing when it was going to happen. I had a horrible teacher who would use his fists, a stick, a shoe, anything he could find. He’d just get angry and lash out.’
v
Threatened: An older pupil holds down a boy while another pupil - put in charge during the teacher's absence - aims a bench at him
Osman’s young cousins go to the same madrassas he attended and told him the beatings were still continuing. This persuaded Osman to try to reveal the truth behind the private world of faith schools. Over a period of two years he bravely placed cameras in both schools and collected highly sensitive material for us. His experience of madrassas is not uncommon. But persuading people to go on camera about this has been difficult. One family who were willing to talk were too frightened to do so openly.
‘Salma’ and ‘Ayesha’ are a mother and daughter whose identities we are protecting. Ayesha is now sitting her A-levels but when she was seven she was beaten at her Koran classes. She says: ‘The teacher would sit there, tell me what to read, pronounce it to me – then if I said it wrong he would hit me on the hands with a ruler.’
Her younger brother, only five at the time, would be hit on his feet with a stick. They dreaded going to those classes but did not tell their mother. Salma eventually withdrew her children from attending madrassas for a completely different reason: she learned that they were being taught an intolerant version of Islam. ‘They were using terms like “Kaffir” just because somebody isn’t of the same religion,’ she says, ‘and I’m teaching my children to integrate and not be racist so I pulled my children out.’
Academic and theologian Dr Taj Hargey invited me to visit his part-time Islamic school in Oxford where children are taught in mixed-gender classes.
Here I witnessed a modern and refreshing method of teaching. Pupils were told to respect other faiths, ask questions about their religion and recite from the Koran in English as well as Arabic.
Dr Hargey told me he set up this school because of claims that Muslim parents had made to him about beatings in other madrassas. ‘It’s an outdated, archaic concept,’ he says, ‘and if we inflict this violence we will sow the seeds of violence in them.’
Sir Roger Singleton, former Government chief adviser on the safety of children, and Ann Cryer, former MP for Keighley, want the law to change to ban physical punishment in supplementary classes, as it does in full-time schools. ‘It just isn’t acceptable,’ says Cryer. ‘We wouldn’t allow this to happen to white kids going to Sunday schools.’
Punished: One of the madrassa students is grabbed by the wrist, pulled towards the teacher in charge of the class and struck on the back
Punished: One of the madrassa students is grabbed by the wrist, pulled towards the teacher in charge of the class and struck on the back
We approached the Darul Uloom Islamic High School in Birmingham with the findings of our film. It claimed that the senior student who gave the speech about Hindus was later reported by other students, and has been expelled, and that no teachers were present ‘during the incident’.
The school said that a speaker who made comments about Jews was ‘visiting’ and his views did not represent school policy. It denied that its religious instruction was hardline or extremist and said it did not tolerate hatred towards any faith group.
In a statement, the school said: ‘Our ethos is for students to be full and active participants of British society.’ It also said that it would study our evidence and take ‘disciplinary measures’ if required.
Regarding the Keighley madrassa, we were told that the Jamia Mosque committee was firm in its resolve to take whatever action was necessary to protect children being taught at the mosque and that it would give its full co-operation to any enquiries resulting from our film.
If the law on physical punishment does change, that would be one way to protect the very young that attend these classes. But these part-time and full-time Muslim schools also need closer scrutiny – the regulatory system needs to be tightened up.
However, we have a Government that, on the one hand, gives grand speeches about tackling the causes of extremism, as David Cameron did last week, while, on the other, encouraging local communities to set up their own schools – including faith schools. It’s time to stop these mixed messages.
And Muslims can no longer sweep this under the carpet – they need to face up to what is happening behind closed doors. Many warn that if we don’t all tackle this toxic mix of hatred and violence head on, we will reap the whirlwind in years to come.

Kærligheden findes ikke i islam

Med Muhammed har islam degraderet den rigtige gammel testamentlige lære om guds enhed på en forkert og umenneskelige måde. Allah er for muhamedanerne en sjælløs, ubevægelig og ubarmhjertig gud. En sådan gud tåler kun sit eget billede. Denne gud fordrer underkastelse og tilbedelse af alle skabninger. Han er den fuldkomne egoisme, en grusom kærlighedsløs tyran, der kun fordrer”
Citat: Marius Baar.

Kærligheden findes ikke i islam

“Guds kærlighed er ukendt for muhamedaneren. Koranerne prædiker had og forbandelse mod og over alle, hinduer, buddhister og ateister, men sandelig også og ikke mindst mod jøder og kristne, der ikke vil bekende sig til islam.
Da Muhammed så, at jøder og kristne ikke omvendte sig til islam, indpodede han hadets gift, der gennem mange hundrede år ikke har mistet virkning.

lørdag den 12. februar 2011

Ægyptisk sharia venter lige om hjørnet...

Det amerikanske analyseinstitut Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life har ved meningsmålinger undersøgt en række arabiske befolkningers værdier. Egypten er det folkerigeste land og blandt de mest konservative i regionen. 85 procent af egypterne mener, at det er godt, at islam spiller en stor rolle i det politiske liv. Lidt mere end 50 procent af egypterne vil adskille mænd og kvinder på arbejdspladserne, og et stort flertal af egypterne er på linje med pakistanerne, når det gælder holdningen til de islamiske strafferegler. Mere end tre ud af fire egyptere er tilhængere af stening til døden for utroskab; mere end tre ud af fire egyptere støtter en straffelov, der foreskriver pisk og afhugning af hænder for tyveri og røveri, og mere end tre ud af fire – helt præcist 84 procent – støtter dødsstraf til alle, der konverterer fra islam.

Multiculturalism has failed

Multiculturalism has failed, says French president

Multiculturalism has failed, says French president AFP/POOL – France's President Nicolas Sarkozy takes questions from some of nine ordinary people on jobs, security, …
PARIS (AFP) – French President Nicolas Sarkozy declared Thursday that multiculturalism had failed, joining a growing number of world leaders or ex-leaders who have condemned it.
"My answer is clearly yes, it is a failure," he said in a television interview when asked about the policy which advocates that host societies welcome and foster distinct cultural and religious immigrant groups.
"Of course we must all respect differences, but we do not want... a society where communities coexist side by side.
"If you come to France, you accept to melt into a single community, which is the national community, and if you do not want to accept that, you cannot be welcome in France," the right-wing president said.
"The French national community cannot accept a change in its lifestyle, equality between men and women... freedom for little girls to go to school," he said.
"We have been too concerned about the identity of the person who was arriving and not enough about the identity of the country that was receiving him," Sarkozy said in the TFI channel show.
British Prime Minister David Cameron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Australia's ex-prime minister John Howard and Spanish ex-premier Jose Maria Aznar have also recently said multicultural policies have not successfully integrated immigrants.
Merkel in October said efforts towards multiculturalism in Germany had "failed, totally."
The comment followed weeks of anguished debate sparked by the huge popularity of a book by a central banker saying that immigrants, in particular Muslims, were making Germany "more stupid."
Britain's Cameron last week pronounced his country's long-standing policy of multiculturalism a failure, calling for better integration of young Muslims to combat home-grown extremism.
He urged a "more active, muscular liberalism" where equal rights, the rule of law, freedom of speech and democracy are actively promoted to create a stronger national identity.
The prime minister, who took power in May 2010, argued that "under the doctrine of state multiculturalism, we have encouraged different cultures to live separate lives, apart from each other and the mainstream".
He said this had resulted in a lack of national identity in Britain which had made some young Muslims turn to extremist ideology.
Sarkozy said in his television interview Thursday that "our Muslim compatriots must be able to practise their religion, as any citizen can," but he noted "we in France do not want people to pray in an ostentatious way in the street."
French far-right leader Marine Le Pen late last year came under fire for comparing Muslims praying in the streets outside overcrowded mosques in France to the Nazi occupation.
Marine Le Pen said there were "ten to fifteen" places in France where Muslims worshipped in the streets outside mosques when these were full.
 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110210/wl_afp/francepoliticsimmigrationsociety_20110210231042

The taste of multiculturalism

Smagen eller rettere af-smagen af Multkulturalismen !



Drømmen om det multikuturelle samfund (som ikke eksisterer - aldrig har eksisteret - eller nogensinde vil komme til at eksistere) lever stadigt ét sted på jorden - i Sverige.....???

fredag den 11. februar 2011

demonstration imod stormoske-planerne på Rådhuspladsen

Socialdemokrat mod - sund fornuft !

Moske- og islamkritiker politianmeldt af Socialdemokratiet for racisme

Formand for Dansk Kultur Rolf Slot-Henriksen politianmeldt af Socialdemokratiet

Jonas Bjørn Jensen, politiker fra Socialdemokratiet og dermed repræsentant for Socialdemokratiet, har politianmeldt sognepræst Rolf Slot-Henriksen for at sende et bekymret brev til borgerrepræsentationen ang. moskeen på Vibevej.
Jonas Bjørn Jensen finder brevet racistisk selvom der ikke er et gram racisme i brevet. Der er kun bekymring og fakta. Men Jonas Bjørn Jensen er ikke ukendt for sine venstreekstreme holdninger der bl.a. går ind for civil ulydighed. Han kalder det endda et sundhedstegn. Han giver også sin fulde støtte til autonome kræfter som Kirkeasyl og mener det er helt OK at udvise civil ulydighed. Her et uddrag fra ekstremistens egen valgkampagne:
Civil ulydighed kendetegner et sundt samfund. Jeg forstår udemærket, at nogle er rigtig trætte af at bo i et land der behandler flygtning som vi gør i Danmark. Jeg har stor respekt for Kirke Asyl, jeg har stor respekt for Per Ramsdal og jeg har kæmpe respekt for alle de der mødte op da kirken blev ryddet.
Vi gengiver her formanden for Dansk Kultur Rolf Slot-Henriksens hele brev til borgerrepræsentationen:
31.1.2011
Til Medlemmerne af Københavns borgerrepræsentation
Nye ekstremistiske moskeer contra Grundloven
Hvorfor blev kritikere af moskeprojektet på Vibevej i København ved høringen truet med at blive myrdet??
Hvorfor blev en kritiker af moskeprojektet slået ned udenfor moskeen?
Hvorfor blev en dansk forfatter, der arrangerede en menneskeretshøring på Christiansborg, efter høringen kaldt op på Irans ambassade og herefter overfaldet 4 gange i sit hjem med alvorlige følger for hans liv og helbred?
Hvorfor er flere kritikere blevet myrdet udenfor tilsvarende ekstremt højreorienterede moskeer i flere andre europæiske lande?
Med bygning af to ekstremistmoskeer i København opgiver man definitivt viljen til integration, men byder til gengæld velkommen til ekstremismen. Hvorfor har vi en grundlov, når politikere ikke holder den? Grundloven taler om trosfrihed, dog at “intet må intet læres, som strider mod sædeligheden eller den offentlige. orden”.
Derfor er de to byggerier forbudt, hvis grundloven følges. Og da Grundloven rangerer over alle andre love og disse bygger på grundloven, så er sagen klar. De to stormoskeer, som er på vej og som ledes af ekstremister, er en velkomst til krig på liv og død. Den krig har stået på siden arvestridighederne ved Muhammeds død: Krigen mellem sunni og shiaislam, der indledes med sunnimuslimernes mord på Ali og hans sønner Hussein og Hassan, der kunne have været profetens arvtagere.
Krigen accelererede  efter  Irans revolution i 79, da shiamuslimske pilgrimme og Saudisk militær kom i krig i Mekka og efterlod et blodbad med 500 døde. Siden har man hvert år bombet hinandens moskeer overalt i verden i en endeløst blodrus.”Velkommen til de smukke moskeer ” siger Anna Allerslev fra de radikale, velkommen til en smuk krig!
Hvorfor er organisationen bag stormoskeen på Vibevej mon forbudt i stribevis af lande? Fordi Ahl-ul Bayt ikke blot er stråmænd for terrorregimet I Iran, men også pga. bevægelsens vold og voldsideologi. Overalt i Europa, hvor de har til huse, har Iran brugt vold, overfald og mord på sine kritikere. Og den anden  nye stormoske  på Islands Brygge hører til den ekstremistiske scene af sunnislam med Saudiarabien i kulissen. Velkommen til stormoskeerne, velkommen krigen.
Sognepræst Rolf Slot-Henriksen, formand for Dansk Kultur

http://siad.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/moske-og-islamkritiker-politianmeldt-af-socialdemokratiet-for-racisme/